, , ,

Protecting Your Care: Strategies for Facing Medical Bias

Health care is supposed to be a place of safety and healing, yet too often it becomes a site of dismissal, doubt, and unequal treatment for patients from marginalized communities. Long waits, minimized pain, delayed testing, and biased assumptions continue to shape medical encounters across clinics, emergency departments, and hospitals. These patterns are not just frustrating, they can be dangerous, even life-threatening.

For patients who already know their bodies, their histories, and even the science behind their conditions, the gap between what they report and how they are treated can feel especially stark. That’s why learning how to advocate for yourself, calmly, firmly, and with a paper trail, is one of the most powerful tools you can carry into a medical encounter.


What Bias Can Look Like


My Story: Dismissed in the ED

I once went to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain. I was wearing my fleece embroidered with my professional role, “Infection Prevention Epidemiologist,” a clear signal that I had a background in public health.

Still, I was treated as if I were a drug addict and before any lab or imaging results were back, I was discharged by a rude resident who told me it was “likely STD/STI-related.” I was not offered an ultrasound. I wasn’t seen by an attending physician. And I was told this despite having zero history of any sexually transmitted infections nor any confirming test results.

That day made clear to me: credentials, professionalism, and composure don’t shield Black women from bias in health care. It also underscored the importance of having the tools and language ready to advocate for yourself, even when the system tries to dismiss you because two days later, I received a personal call from the president of the hospital apologizing profusely and asking that I refrain from reporting the incident…I still reported it.


Real-World Examples You Might Encounter

1. The “leading question” trap (pain management)

This sets you up to name a drug, so later they can write, “Patient requested opioids.”

How to respond:
“I’m not requesting a specific drug. I’m asking for treatment that matches my symptoms. What are all the evidence-based options we can consider?”


2. Emergency care dismissal

How to respond:
“Because chest pain can indicate a heart attack, I want an EKG and cardiac enzymes documented as part of the evaluation.”


3. Maternal care minimization

How to respond:
“I understand some swelling can be normal, but these are red-flag symptoms for preeclampsia. I’d like this documented and evaluated right away.”


4. Technology blind spot

How to respond:
“Because oximeters can misread on darker skin, could you confirm with a repeat test or another method?”


5. Algorithmic bias (hospital setting)

How to respond:
“Given my medical history, what criteria are being used to decide whether I qualify for extra support?”


Self-Advocacy Strategies


Where to Report Discrimination

If you experience racial discrimination in a hospital:

Tip: Again, always request in writing that denied labs, imaging, or referrals be noted in your chart. This creates a clear record.

Why the System Resists

It’s not only individual bias that creates these moments. Many patterns are driven by the financial incentives of insurers and pharmaceutical companies. Insurers profit by limiting testing, treatments, and hospital stays. Pharmaceutical companies profit by pushing certain drugs over others and hoarding patents. These pressures filter down into how some clinicians practice: shortcuts, suspicion, and outright denials that can put patients at risk.

Recognizing that resistance doesn’t make it easier, but it helps you see the bigger picture. When your request for a reasonable test is denied, it may be about profit margins as much as prejudice. This is why creating documentation and demanding transparency are so powerful: they leave less room for financial or biased motives to go unchallenged.


Final Thoughts

Even when you show up as an expert in health care, bias can strip away dignity and compromise care. That’s why calm precision, clear requests, and documentation are so vital. Minority groups, black women especially given the stats, deserve evidence-based medicine without prejudice. All.People.Do. Until institutions change, the best protection we have is to advocate, fiercely and unapologetically, for ourselves and our health.


References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025, February 1). Maternal mortality rates in the United States, 2023 (NCHS Health E-Stats). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2023/Estat-maternal-mortality.pdf

Hoffman, K. M., Trawalter, S., Axt, J. R., & Oliver, M. N. (2016). Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between Blacks and Whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(16), 4296–4301. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4843483/

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. (2024, July 8). Pulse oximeters’ racial bias. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/pulse-oximeters-racial-bias

Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aax2342

Stillman, K., et al. (2024). Socio-demographic disparities in emergency department triage and wait times. Annals of Emergency Medicine. https://www.annemergmed.com/article/S0196-0644%2824%2900651-6/fulltext

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.